Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kumar, Ravinder
- Integration of Organic Amendments and Antagonists for the Management of Sheath Blight in Aromatic Rice
Abstract Views :250 |
PDF Views:119
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Plant Pathology, Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut 250110, Uttar Pradesh, IN
1 Department of Plant Pathology, Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut 250110, Uttar Pradesh, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 23, No 3 (2009), Pagination: 305-309Abstract
The effect of integration of organic amendments with fungal or bacterial antagonists (Trichoderma harzianum and Pseudomonas fluorescens) applied as soil treatment was evaluated against sheath blight disease in Basmati rice caused by Rhizoctonia solani under field conditions. Neem cake + T. harzianum was found to be the most effective treatment in reducing the disease incidence by up to 57.27% and disease severity by 54.77% followed by farm yard manure (FYM) + T. harzianum, which resulted in the reduction of disease incidence to 53.77% and disease severity to 52.29%, respectively. Among all the organic amendments, reduction of sheath blight was lowest with sawdust + P. fluorescens with disease incidence of 40.94% and disease severity of 35.29%. Maximum increase in grain yield (39.44%) and 1000-grain weight of rice (29.19g) were recorded with neem cake + T. harzianum treatment followed by treatments FYM + T. harzianum and pressmud + T. harzianum. Minimum increase in grain yield (9.76%) and 1000-grain weight (11.53%) were recorded with the treatment Sawdust + P. fluorescens.Keywords
Antagonist, Organic Amendment, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Rice, Sheath Blight, Trichoderma harzianum.References
- Baby, U. I. and Manibhushanrao, K. 1993. Control of ricesheath blight through the integration of fungalantagonists and organic amendments. TropicalAgriculture (Trinidad), 70 : 240–244.
- Das, B. C., Borta, L.C., Phookan, A. K. and Bhagabati. 1996. Antagonistic effects of Aspergillus terreus,Trichoderma harzianum and Trichoderma virideon sheath blight of rice. Oryza, 33: 62–65.
- Dath, A. P. 1990. Sheath blight disease of rice and itsmanagement. Associated publishing Co., NewDelhi, 129pp.
- Organic amendments and antagonists for the management of sheath blightHowell, C. R. 2002. Cotton seedlings pre-emergencedamping–off incited by Rhizopus oryzae andPythium spp. and its biological control withTrichoderma spp. Phytopathology, 92: 177–180.
- International Rice Research Institute. 1996. StandardEvaluation System for rice. InternationalRice Testing Programme 2nd ed. Los Banos,Philippines, 88pp.
- Kannaiyan, S. and Prasad, N. N. 1983. Effects of foliar sprayof micronutrient on rice sheath blight disease. International Rice Research Newsletter, 4: 13.
- Khan, A. A. and Sinha, A. P. 2005. Influence of soiland nutritional factors on the effectivity ofTrichoderma harzianum against sheath blight ofrice. Indian Phytopathology, 58: 276–281.
- Khan, A. A. and Sinha, A. P. 2006. Integration of fungalantagonist and organic amendments for the controlof rice sheath blight. Indian Phytopathology,59: 363–385.
- Meena, B. and Muthusamy, M. 1999. Effect of organic soilamendments against rice sheath blight. IndianPhytopathology, 52: 92–93.
- Naidu, V. D. 1992. Influence of sheath blight of rice ongrain and straw yield in some popular localvarieties. Journal of Research Assam AgricultureUniversity, 10: 78–80.
- Tiwari, L. and Singh, R. 2005. Biological control ofsheath blight of rice by Trichoderma harzianumusing different delivery systems. IndianPhytopathology, 58: 35–40.
- Vidhyasekaran, P. and Muthamilan, M. 1999. Evaluationof Pseudomonas fluorescens for controlling ricesheath blight. Biocontrol Science and Technology,9: 67–74.
- Walsh, U. F., Morrissey, J. P. and O’Gara, F. 2000. Pseudomonas for biocontrol of phytopathogens:from functional genomics to commercialexploitation. Current Opinion in Biotechnology,12: 289–295.
- Xue, A. G. 2003. Biological control of pathogenscausing ischolar_main rot complex in field pea usingClonostachys rosea strain ACM–941Phytopathology, 93: 329–335.
- Integration of Bioagents and Fungicides for Management of Collar Rot of Chickpea
Abstract Views :188 |
PDF Views:141
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Plant Pathology, Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel University of Agric. & Tech., Meerut, 250110 (U.P.), IN
1 Department of Plant Pathology, Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel University of Agric. & Tech., Meerut, 250110 (U.P.), IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 22, No 2 (2008), Pagination: 487-489Abstract
Two fungicides (carboxin and thiram) and two bio-control agents (Pseudomonas fluorescens and Trichoderma harzianum) were evaluated as seed treatment in different combinations against Sclerotium rolfsii, the causal organism of collar rot of chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Seed treated with T. harzianum (4g/kg seed) + carboxin (0.5g/kg seed) provided maximum protection to the crop by giving maximum seedling emergence (495.0/20 m2), final plant stand (480.4/20m2) and grain yield (18.2q/ha). Other treatment combinations significantly increased seedling emergence, final plant stand and grain yield compared to control.Keywords
Carboxin, Pseudomonas fluoresceus, Sclerotium rolfsii, Seed Treatment, Thiram, Trichoderma harzianum.- Standardization of Release Rate of Trichogramma chilonis (Ishii) in Bio-Intensive Management of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Fodder Maize
Abstract Views :265 |
PDF Views:113
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana – 141004, Punjab, IN
2 Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana – 141004, Punjab, IN
1 Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana – 141004, Punjab, IN
2 Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana – 141004, Punjab, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 31, No 4 (2017), Pagination: 254-258Abstract
The early season attack of Chilo partellus, in kharif sown fodder maize inflicts appreciable losses, if unchecked. Biointensive management with the use of egg parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis Ishii in fodder maize through different doses and release rate was standardized. The results of the trials from two years showed that damage parameters like Leaf Injury (LI), recorded three weeks after parasitoid release from 0.25-6.00 per cent across different treatments whereas in untreated control it was 6.50-13.25 %, respectively. Similarly the observations on percent DH patterns in different treatments varied from 0.62-3.75 % as compared to control (5.50-9.0 %). Furthermore, the per cent reduction in damage was substantially low with the second inundative release of the parasitoid than plots receiving a single release of bio-agent at a given dose. The proportion of DH recorded at three weeks after release was significantly lower (1.0 and 0.62%) in plots with t-cards @ 125,000 parasitized eggs in two releases as compared with other treatments. Additionally the green fodder yield obtained in promising treatment was statistically superior (445 q ha-1) to 392 q ha-1 GFY as recorded in the untreated control and other lower dose treatments except the plots receiving the highest dose of parasitoid release (450q ha-1). Thus the results suggested that field release of T. chilonis @ 125,000 parasitoids per hectare in two releases helps in substantial reduction of C. partellus inflicted damage with high economic returns.Keywords
Chilo partellus, Deadhearts, Fodder Maize, Leaf Injury, Trichogramma chilonis.References
- Farid A, Khan MIN, Khan A, Khattak SUK, Amamzeb, Sattar A. 2007. Studies on maize stem borer, Chilo partellus in Peshawar Valley. Pak J. Zool. 39(2):127–131 Aggarwal N, Jindal J. 2013. Validation of biocontrol technology for suppression of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) on kharif maize in Punjab. J Biol Control 27(4): 278-284.
- Arabjafari KH, Jalali SK. 2007. Identification and analysis of host plant resistance in leading maize genotypes against spotted stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Pak. J Biol Sci. 10: 1885–1895. Crossref. PMid:19086556
- Cheema HS, Singh B. 1991. Software Statistical Package CPCS-I. Department of Statistics. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
- Prasad GS, Babu KS, Subbarayudu B, Bhagwat VR, Patil JV. 2015. Identification of sweet sorghum accessions possessing multiple resistance to shoot fly (Atherigona soccata Rondani) and spotted stem borer (Chilo partellus swinhoe). Sugar Tech. 17(2): 173–180. Crossref.
- Gomez KA, Agomez A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd edn. Wiley–Interscience, New York. 680 pp.
- Jalali SK, Singh SP. 2006. Biological control of Chilo partellus using egg parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis and Bacillus thuringiensis. Indian J. Agri Res. 40(3): 183–189.
- Pal R, Singh G, Prased CS, Ali N, Kumar A, Dhaka SS. 2009. Field evaluation of bio-pesticide and bio-agent against maize stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize. Ann Pl Prot Sci. 17: 325–327.
- Pingali PI. 2001. CIMMYT. 1999-2000: World maize facts and trends, meeting world maize need, technological opportunities and priorities for the public sector. CIMMYT, Mexico. D.F: 57.
- Rawat US, Pawar AD, Joshi V.1994. Impact of inundative releases of Trichogramma chilonis in control of maize stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Himachal Pradesh. Pl Prot Bull. 46: 28–30.
- Siddiqui KH, Marwaha KK. 1993. The vistas of maize entomology in India, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India, 185 pp.
- Somchaudhary AK, Dutt N. 1988. Influence of hosts and host ages on bionomics of Trichogramma perkinsi Girault and Trichogramma australicum Girault. Indian J Ent. 50: 374–379